[darcs-users] Hunk merging and interactive edit

Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Mon May 2 06:51:11 UTC 2011

Ganesh Sittampalam writes:

 > The main issue here, which is of getting the "right" hunks to be
 > recorded, is really orthogonal to separating changes.

I disagree.  Indeed there are aspects of correctly specifying hunks
that will be independent of change separation (as in the example of
adding a whole function that you give), but the issue of whether
abutting blocks of changes should be recorded as one hunk or multiple
hunks clearly depends on the intent of the author, ie, change

More information about the darcs-users mailing list