[darcs-users] The minimal set of changes
Xan
xancorreu at gmail.com
Tue Nov 25 14:28:37 UTC 2014
>
> I think this is an important topic though, particularly if/when darcs
> acquires more and more complicated patch types.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ganesh
>
Can you describe what you mean here? Which "easy" patches has darcs got now?
On the other hand, I think we could treat patches as changes of *sets* of files. You can't know which file was the previous file (rename, cp, etc.). I think it could be interesting to focus on contents on the files rather than in the path names (using sha hashes for example). The change in path name could be a path too. I think git use it so. I don't say we have to copy that, but perhaps darcs could be more clever....
Thanks,
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list