[Evolution-users] Local delivery account

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Sun, 2025-10-26 at 10:13 -0400, janos via evolution-users wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-10-26 at 10:54 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2025-10-25 at 22:25 -0400, janos via evolution-users wrote:
> > 
> > Reply-to-All is still necessary when replying to someone who had
> > themselves used Reply-to-All, because the various List-* headers are
> > no
> > longer present in their message.
> Let me get this straight:
> 
> * if the "From:" line has somebody@<email address> then Reply to list
> is appropriate, and the composed reply will show To:
> evolution-users at lists.usoosl.org only
> 
> * if the "From:" line has something--- via evolution-users
> <evolution-users at lists.osuosl.org> then Reply-to-All is the correct
> way, and the composed reply will show "To:" both email address; the
> "...via evolution users" and
> the evolution-users at lists.usoosl.org addresses.

Forget what the From: line says. It may have the originator's address
or it may have the "Community" address as Pete explained earlier. What
matters for Reply-To-List is that the *List-* headers are in the
message being replied to, because that's what Evo is looking at. If
they aren't there, then it will use Reply-to-All, and that reply will
of course not have the List headers either, so the whole chain from
then on is broken.

poc