[Intel-wired-lan] [net-next S5 14/15] i40e/i40evf: remove last_rx reference in receive

[Young, James M]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at lists.osuosl.org] On
> Behalf Of Young, James M
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:47 AM
> To: Sullivan, Catherine; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next S5 14/15] i40e/i40evf: remove last_rx
> reference in receive
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-wired-lan
> > [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at lists.osuosl.org] On Behalf Of
> > Catherine Sullivan
> > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 11:57 AM
> > To: intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next S5 14/15] i40e/i40evf: remove
> > last_rx reference in receive
> >
> > From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg at intel.com>
> >
> > The driver was suffering a slow down in RX performance due to
> > accessing this cache line from all receive queues, which resulted in a
> > performance improvement for forwarding packets with this patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg at intel.com>
> > Change-ID: Ie841a72289207eadf8a16b1013ffe83dfec6db1d
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c   | 2 --
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c | 2 --
> >  2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
Tested-by: Jim Young <james.m.young at intel.com> 
This is a resend because the original  "tested-by" email  had a formatting error which prevented it from triggering the "tested" bit in patchwork.