[Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH] ixgbe: add new bus type for intergrated I/O interface (IOSF)

Skidmore, Donald C donald.c.skidmore at intel.com
Thu Jun 18 19:50:58 UTC 2015



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:alexander.h.duyck at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:45 PM
> To: Skidmore, Donald C; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH] ixgbe: add new bus type for
> intergrated I/O interface (IOSF)
> 
> On 06/18/2015 10:24 AM, Donald C Skidmore wrote:
> > With this patch we add support for a new bus type
> ixgbe_bus_type_internal.
> > X550em devices use IOSF and not PCIe bus so this new type is to
> > accommodate them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Donald C Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c |   11 ++++++++++-
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h |    1 +
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c |    1 +
> >   3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > index 5f1b06a..dd53abd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > @@ -246,11 +246,19 @@ static inline bool ixgbe_pcie_from_parent(struct
> ixgbe_hw *hw)
> >   static void ixgbe_check_minimum_link(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> >   				     int expected_gts)
> >   {
> > +	struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> >   	int max_gts = 0;
> >   	enum pci_bus_speed speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> >   	enum pcie_link_width width = PCIE_LNK_WIDTH_UNKNOWN;
> >   	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> >
> > +	/* Some devices are not connected over PCIe and thus do not
> negotiate
> > +	 * speed. These devices do not have valid bus info, and thus any
> report
> > +	 * we generate may not be correct.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (hw->bus.type == ixgbe_bus_type_internal)
> > +		return;
> > +
> >   	/* determine whether to use the parent device */
> >   	if (ixgbe_pcie_from_parent(&adapter->hw))
> >   		pdev = adapter->pdev->bus->parent->self; @@ -8844,9
> +8852,10 @@
> > skip_sriov:
> >   	hw->eeprom.ops.read(hw, 0x2d, &adapter->eeprom_verl);
> >
> >   	/* pick up the PCI bus settings for reporting later */
> > -	hw->mac.ops.get_bus_info(hw);
> >   	if (ixgbe_pcie_from_parent(hw))
> >   		ixgbe_get_parent_bus_info(adapter);
> > +	else
> > +		 hw->mac.ops.get_bus_info(hw);
> >
> >   	/* calculate the expected PCIe bandwidth required for optimal
> >   	 * performance. Note that some older parts will never have enough
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
> > index 19271e5..37df15f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
> > @@ -3067,6 +3067,7 @@ enum ixgbe_bus_type {
> >   	ixgbe_bus_type_pci,
> >   	ixgbe_bus_type_pcix,
> >   	ixgbe_bus_type_pci_express,
> > +	ixgbe_bus_type_internal,
> >   	ixgbe_bus_type_reserved
> >   };
> >
> 
> Are there really any parts that are listed as using a pci or pcix type?
> If not you could probably drop those types from the enum since they don't
> add any value.

I really like that idea. :)  Still wouldn't that be worth of its own patch, even though it would be really small patch?

Thanks,
-Don


More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list