[Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue] fm10k: use snprintf() instead of sprintf() to avoid buffer overflow
jesse.brandeburg at intel.com
Wed Aug 26 16:44:58 UTC 2015
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:01:58 -0700
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller at intel.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller at intel.com>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_debugfs.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_ethtool.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
The changes look fine, but I've seen multiple comments to the list that
there needs to be a body in the commit message.
fm10k: use snprintf()
Avoid buffer overflow and follow best practices by using snprintf()
instead of sprintf().
More information about the Intel-wired-lan