[Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue] fm10k: use snprintf() instead of sprintf() to avoid buffer overflow

Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.keller at intel.com
Wed Aug 26 16:46:19 UTC 2015

On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 09:44 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> The changes look fine, but I've seen multiple comments to the list
> that
> there needs to be a body in the commit message.

Really? Even for fairly trivial changes such as this?

I can re-work it.


More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list