[Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue v2 01/17] fm10k: conditionally compile DCB and DebugFS support

[Jeff Kirsher]

On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:03 -0700, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 09:42 -0700, ND Linux CI Server wrote:
> > Bisectability test results for configuration "intel_defconfig,x86"
> > 
> > Failed to build patch #3: 9800d00 fm10k: reinitialize queuing
> scheme after calling init_hw
> > Configuration: "intel_defconfig, architecture x86".
> > 
> > 
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c: In function
> ‘fm10k_reinit’:
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c:176:3: error: label
> ‘reinit_err’ used but not defined
> >    goto reinit_err;
> >    ^
> > make[6]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.o] Error 1
> > Failed to build patch #4: ef14b12 fm10k: reset max_queues on
> init_hw_vf failure
> > Configuration: "intel_defconfig, architecture x86".
> > 
> > 
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c: In function
> ‘fm10k_reinit’:
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c:176:3: error: label
> ‘reinit_err’ used but not defined
> >    goto reinit_err;
> >    ^
> > make[6]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.o] Error 1
> 
> This can be fixed by just re-ordering patch 3 as patch 5, but I can
> resend if you don't want to do that by hand. There is no merge
> conflict
> when I did it via interactive rebase.

Please resend with this resolved.  If I do it by hand, I may not
remember to do so later on when/if I push them upstream.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20151014/e117a418/attachment.asc>