[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize fm10k_workqueue at global level

Allan, Bruce W bruce.w.allan at intel.com
Tue Nov 3 23:15:17 UTC 2015


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keller, Jacob E
> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 3:05 PM
> To: Allan, Bruce W; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize fm10k_workqueue at global
> level
> 
> On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 22:40 +0000, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Keller, Jacob E
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:35 AM
> > > To: Intel Wired LAN
> > > Cc: Allan, Bruce W; Keller, Jacob E
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize fm10k_workqueue at
> > > global level
> > >
> > > From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan at intel.com>
> > >
> > > Cleans up checkpatch GLOBAL_INITIALIZERS error
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > -v2
> > > * Fix title from checkpatch complaint
> >
> > Out of curiosity, what was wrong with the original v1 patch title and
> > what was the exact checkpatch complaint?
> >
> 
> checkpatch.pl results for patch "[PATCH] fm10k: fix checkpatch
> GLOBAL_INITIALISERS error"
> 
> WARNING:EMAIL_SUBJECT: A patch subject line should describe the change
> not the tool that found it
> #4:
> Subject: [PATCH] fm10k: fix checkpatch GLOBAL_INITIALISERS error
> 
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Jake

Which version of checkpatch and options did you use?  I tried with the one in Jeff's tree and others but do not get the same.


More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list