[Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH] igb/igbvf: don't give up

Rustad, Mark D mark.d.rustad at intel.com
Fri Dec 18 01:56:38 UTC 2015

Aaron F <aaron.f.brown at intel.com> wrote:

> Is there any reason not to use usleep_range here?

Can the routines ever be called from any atomic context, such as an interrupt or while a lock is held? If so, you can't use any form of sleep.

Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20151218/22af9160/attachment.asc>

More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list