[Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH] igb/igbvf: don't give up
Rustad, Mark D
mark.d.rustad at intel.com
Fri Dec 18 01:56:38 UTC 2015
Aaron F <aaron.f.brown at intel.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason not to use usleep_range here?
Can the routines ever be called from any atomic context, such as an interrupt or while a lock is held? If so, you can't use any form of sleep.
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Intel-wired-lan