[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 4/6] fm10k: update driver summary and reduce code duplication

[Keller, Jacob E]

On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 23:51 +0000, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at lists.osuosl.
> > org] On
> > Behalf Of Allan, Bruce W
> > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 1:46 PM
> > To: Singh, Krishneil K <krishneil.k.singh at intel.com>; Keller, Jacob
> > E
> > <jacob.e.keller at intel.com>; Intel Wired LAN <intel-wired-
> > lan at lists.osuosl.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 4/6] fm10k: update driver
> > summary
> > and reduce code duplication
> > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at lists.osuos
> > > l.org]
> > On
> > > 
> > > Behalf Of Singh, Krishneil K
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:30 PM
> > > To: Keller, Jacob E; Intel Wired LAN
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 4/6] fm10k: update driver
> > > summary
> > > and reduce code duplication
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at lists.osuos
> > > l.org]
> > On
> > > 
> > > Behalf Of Jacob Keller
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 2:46 PM
> > > To: Intel Wired LAN <intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org>
> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 4/6] fm10k: update driver
> > > summary and
> > > reduce code duplication
> > > 
> > > Use DRV_SUMMARY, similar to DRV_VERSION so that we don't have to
> > > duplicate the driver summary. Also update summary to more
> > > accurately
> > > describe the driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <Krishneil.k.singh at intel.com>
> > Please hold off on submitting this patch to netdev...the driver
> > summary
> > might not be
> > correct based on recent events.
> The driver summary/module description should not be changed to what
> is in this
> patch.  Expect a v2 from Jake.
> 
> Bruce.

Isn't there a replacement in the queue already? I'll rework this if so,
but I was pretty sure I already did.

Thanks,
Jake