[Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH 0/3] Add support for GSO partial to Intel NIC drivers
Jeff Kirsher
jeffrey.t.kirsher at intel.com
Sat Apr 9 06:59:09 UTC 2016
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 17:06 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> So these are the patches needed to enable tunnel segmentation
> offloads on
> the igb, igbvf, ixgbe, and ixgbevf drivers. In addition this patch
> extends
> the i40e and i40evf drivers to include segmentation support for
> tunnels
> with outer checksums.
>
> The net performance gain for these patches are pretty significant.
> In the
> case of i40e a tunnel with outer checksums showed the following
> improvement:
> Throughput Throughput Local Local Result
> Units CPU Service Tag
> Util Demand
> %
> 14066.29 10^6bits/s 3.49 0.651 "before"
> 20618.16 10^6bits/s 3.09 0.393 "after"
>
> For ixgbe similar results were seen:
> Throughput Throughput Local Local Result
> Units CPU Service Tag
> Util Demand
> %
> 12879.89 10^6bits/s 10.00 0.763 "before"
> 14286.77 10^6bits/s 5.74 0.395 "after"
>
> These patches all rely on the TSO_MANGLEID and GSO_PARTIAL patches so
> I
> would not recommend applying them until those patches have first been
> applied.
Sorry I did not see this until after I tried applying your series. :-(
Maybe the two dependent patches should have been in the series, so I
and others do not waste their time. Or not send this until the two
patches were accepted.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20160408/1e0d1721/attachment-0001.asc>
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list