[Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH v3 3/3] e1000: bundle xdp xmit routines
Tom Herbert
tom at herbertland.com
Mon Sep 12 23:45:22 UTC 2016
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:14 PM, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend at gmail.com> wrote:
> e1000 supports a single TX queue so it is being shared with the stack
> when XDP runs XDP_TX action. This requires taking the xmit lock to
> ensure we don't corrupt the tx ring. To avoid taking and dropping the
> lock per packet this patch adds a bundling implementation to submit
> a bundle of packets to the xmit routine.
>
> I tested this patch running e1000 in a VM using KVM over a tap
> device using pktgen to generate traffic along with 'ping -f -l 100'.
>
John,
It still looks to me like this will break the normal TX path. Can you
test these patches on real e1000 to get performance numbers for both
the drop and forwarding case. Also can you run this against an
antagonist workload over the normal stack to see if one or the other
path can be starved?
Thanks,
Tom
> Suggested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h | 10 +++
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h
> index 5cf8a0a..877b377 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h
> @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ struct e1000_adapter;
> #define E1000_TX_QUEUE_WAKE 16
> /* How many Rx Buffers do we bundle into one write to the hardware ? */
> #define E1000_RX_BUFFER_WRITE 16 /* Must be power of 2 */
> +/* How many XDP XMIT buffers to bundle into one xmit transaction */
> +#define E1000_XDP_XMIT_BUNDLE_MAX E1000_RX_BUFFER_WRITE
>
> #define AUTO_ALL_MODES 0
> #define E1000_EEPROM_82544_APM 0x0004
> @@ -168,6 +170,11 @@ struct e1000_rx_buffer {
> dma_addr_t dma;
> };
>
> +struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle {
> + struct e1000_rx_buffer *buffer;
> + u32 length;
> +};
> +
> struct e1000_tx_ring {
> /* pointer to the descriptor ring memory */
> void *desc;
> @@ -206,6 +213,9 @@ struct e1000_rx_ring {
> struct e1000_rx_buffer *buffer_info;
> struct sk_buff *rx_skb_top;
>
> + /* array of XDP buffer information structs */
> + struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle *xdp_buffer;
> +
> /* cpu for rx queue */
> int cpu;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index 232b927..31489d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -848,6 +848,15 @@ static int e1000_xdp_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
>
> + if (!adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer) {
> + int size = sizeof(struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle) *
> + E1000_XDP_XMIT_BUNDLE_MAX;
> +
> + adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer = vzalloc(size);
> + if (!adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> old_prog = xchg(&adapter->prog, prog);
> if (old_prog) {
> synchronize_net();
> @@ -1319,6 +1328,9 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if (adapter->prog)
> bpf_prog_put(adapter->prog);
>
> + if (adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer)
> + vfree(adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer);
> +
> unregister_netdev(netdev);
>
> e1000_phy_hw_reset(hw);
> @@ -3372,29 +3384,17 @@ static void e1000_tx_map_rxpage(struct e1000_tx_ring *tx_ring,
>
> static void e1000_xmit_raw_frame(struct e1000_rx_buffer *rx_buffer_info,
> u32 len,
> + struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> struct net_device *netdev,
> - struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> + struct e1000_tx_ring *tx_ring)
> {
> - struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, 0);
> - struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> - struct e1000_tx_ring *tx_ring;
> + const struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, 0);
>
> if (len > E1000_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD)
> return;
>
> - /* e1000 only support a single txq at the moment so the queue is being
> - * shared with stack. To support this requires locking to ensure the
> - * stack and XDP are not running at the same time. Devices with
> - * multiple queues should allocate a separate queue space.
> - */
> - HARD_TX_LOCK(netdev, txq, smp_processor_id());
> -
> - tx_ring = adapter->tx_ring;
> -
> - if (E1000_DESC_UNUSED(tx_ring) < 2) {
> - HARD_TX_UNLOCK(netdev, txq);
> + if (E1000_DESC_UNUSED(tx_ring) < 2)
> return;
> - }
>
> if (netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped(txq))
> return;
> @@ -3402,7 +3402,36 @@ static void e1000_xmit_raw_frame(struct e1000_rx_buffer *rx_buffer_info,
> e1000_tx_map_rxpage(tx_ring, rx_buffer_info, len);
> netdev_sent_queue(netdev, len);
> e1000_tx_queue(adapter, tx_ring, 0/*tx_flags*/, 1);
> +}
>
> +static void e1000_xdp_xmit_bundle(struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle *buffer_info,
> + struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, 0);
> + struct e1000_tx_ring *tx_ring = adapter->tx_ring;
> + struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + /* e1000 only support a single txq at the moment so the queue is being
> + * shared with stack. To support this requires locking to ensure the
> + * stack and XDP are not running at the same time. Devices with
> + * multiple queues should allocate a separate queue space.
> + *
> + * To amortize the locking cost e1000 bundles the xmits and send up to
> + * E1000_XDP_XMIT_BUNDLE_MAX.
> + */
> + HARD_TX_LOCK(netdev, txq, smp_processor_id());
> +
> + for (; i < E1000_XDP_XMIT_BUNDLE_MAX && buffer_info[i].buffer; i++) {
> + e1000_xmit_raw_frame(buffer_info[i].buffer,
> + buffer_info[i].length,
> + adapter, netdev, tx_ring);
> + buffer_info[i].buffer = NULL;
> + buffer_info[i].length = 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* kick hardware to send bundle and return control back to the stack */
> writel(tx_ring->next_to_use, hw->hw_addr + tx_ring->tdt);
> mmiowb();
>
> @@ -4284,9 +4313,10 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> struct bpf_prog *prog;
> u32 length;
> unsigned int i;
> - int cleaned_count = 0;
> + int cleaned_count = 0, xdp_xmit = 0;
> bool cleaned = false;
> unsigned int total_rx_bytes = 0, total_rx_packets = 0;
> + struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle *xdp_bundle = rx_ring->xdp_buffer;
>
> rcu_read_lock(); /* rcu lock needed here to protect xdp programs */
> prog = READ_ONCE(adapter->prog);
> @@ -4341,12 +4371,13 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> case XDP_PASS:
> break;
> case XDP_TX:
> + xdp_bundle[xdp_xmit].buffer = buffer_info;
> + xdp_bundle[xdp_xmit].length = length;
> dma_sync_single_for_device(&pdev->dev,
> dma,
> length,
> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> - e1000_xmit_raw_frame(buffer_info, length,
> - netdev, adapter);
> + xdp_xmit++;
> case XDP_DROP:
> default:
> /* re-use mapped page. keep buffer_info->dma
> @@ -4488,8 +4519,14 @@ next_desc:
>
> /* return some buffers to hardware, one at a time is too slow */
> if (unlikely(cleaned_count >= E1000_RX_BUFFER_WRITE)) {
> + if (xdp_xmit)
> + e1000_xdp_xmit_bundle(xdp_bundle,
> + netdev,
> + adapter);
> +
> adapter->alloc_rx_buf(adapter, rx_ring, cleaned_count);
> cleaned_count = 0;
> + xdp_xmit = 0;
> }
>
> /* use prefetched values */
> @@ -4500,8 +4537,11 @@ next_desc:
> rx_ring->next_to_clean = i;
>
> cleaned_count = E1000_DESC_UNUSED(rx_ring);
> - if (cleaned_count)
> + if (cleaned_count) {
> + if (xdp_xmit)
> + e1000_xdp_xmit_bundle(xdp_bundle, netdev, adapter);
> adapter->alloc_rx_buf(adapter, rx_ring, cleaned_count);
> + }
>
> adapter->total_rx_packets += total_rx_packets;
> adapter->total_rx_bytes += total_rx_bytes;
>
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list