[Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH v3 1/3] e1000: track BQL bytes regardless of skb or not
Tom Herbert
tom at herbertland.com
Tue Sep 13 04:25:43 UTC 2016
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:13 PM, John Fastabend
> <john.fastabend at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The BQL API does not reference the sk_buff nor does the driver need to
>> reference the sk_buff to calculate the length of a transmitted frame.
>> This patch removes an sk_buff reference from the xmit irq path and
>> also allows packets sent from XDP to use BQL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 7 ++-----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
>> index f42129d..62a7f8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
>> @@ -3882,11 +3882,8 @@ static bool e1000_clean_tx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
>> if (cleaned) {
>> total_tx_packets += buffer_info->segs;
>> total_tx_bytes += buffer_info->bytecount;
>> - if (buffer_info->skb) {
>> - bytes_compl += buffer_info->skb->len;
>> - pkts_compl++;
>> - }
>> -
>> + bytes_compl += buffer_info->length;
>> + pkts_compl++;
>> }
>> e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource(adapter, buffer_info);
>> tx_desc->upper.data = 0;
>
> Actually it might be worth looking into why we have two different
> stats for tracking bytecount and segs. From what I can tell the
> pkts_compl value is never actually used. The function doesn't even
> use the value so it is just wasted cycles. And as far as the bytes go
Transmit flow steering which I posted and is pending on some testing
uses the pkt count BQL to track inflight packets.
> the accounting would be more accurate if you were to use bytecount
> instead of buffer_info->skb->len. You would just need to update the
> xmit function to use that on the other side so that they match.
>
> - Alex
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list