[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] igb: Clarify idleslope config constraints
Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
jesus.sanchez-palencia at intel.com
Fri Nov 10 22:21:50 UTC 2017
By design, the idleslope increments are restricted to 16.384kbps steps.
Add a comment to igb_main.c making that explicit and add one example
that illustrates the impact of that.
Signed-off-by: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia at intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index 43cf39527660..d56c998f3f14 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -1744,6 +1744,20 @@ static void igb_configure_cbs(struct igb_adapter *adapter, int queue,
* value = idleSlope * 61034
* ----------------- (E6)
* 1000000
+ *
+ * NOTE: For i210, given the above, we can see that idleslope
+ * is represented in 16.38431 kbps units by the value at
+ * the TQAVCC register (1Gbps / 61034), which reduces
+ * the granularity for idleslope increments.
+ * For instance, if you want to configure a 2576kbps
+ * idleslope, the value to be written on the register
+ * would have to be 157.23. If rounded down, you end
+ * up with less bandwidth available than originally
+ * required (~2572 kbps). If rounded up, you end up
+ * with a higher bandwidth (~2589 kbps). Below the
+ * approach we take is to always round up the
+ * calculated value, so the resulting bandwidth might
+ * be slightly higher for some configurations.
*/
value = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(idleslope * 61034ULL, 1000000);
--
2.14.1
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list