[Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v3 net-next 13/18] net/sched: Introduce the TBS Qdisc

Thomas Gleixner tglx at linutronix.de
Tue Apr 24 08:50:04 UTC 2018


On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 06:46 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote:
> >> +struct tbs_sched_data {
> >> +	bool sorting;
> >> +	int clockid;
> >> +	int queue;
> >> +	s32 delta; /* in ns */
> >> +	ktime_t last; /* The txtime of the last skb sent to the netdevice. */
> >> +	struct rb_root head;
> > 
> > Hmm. You are reimplementing timerqueue open coded. Have you checked whether
> > you could reuse the timerqueue implementation?
> > 
> > That requires to add a timerqueue node to struct skbuff
> > 
> > @@ -671,7 +671,8 @@ struct sk_buff {
> >  				unsigned long		dev_scratch;
> >  			};
> >  		};
> > -		struct rb_node	rbnode; /* used in netem & tcp stack */
> > +		struct rb_node		rbnode; /* used in netem & tcp stack */
> > +		struct timerqueue_node	tqnode;
> >  	};
> >  	struct sock		*sk;
> > 
> > Then you can use timerqueue_head in your scheduler data and all the open
> > coded rbtree handling goes away.
> 
> 
> I just noticed that doing the above increases the size of struct sk_buff by 8
> bytes - struct timerqueue_node is 32bytes long while struct rb_node is only
> 24bytes long.
> 
> Given the feedback we got here before against touching struct sk_buff at all for
> non-generic use cases, I will keep the implementation of sch_tbs.c as is, thus
> keeping the open-coded version for now, ok?

The size of sk_buff is 216 and the size of sk_buff_fclones is 440
bytes. The sk_buff and sk_buff_fclones kmem_caches use objects sized 256
and 512 bytes because the kmem_caches are created with SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN.

So adding 8 bytes to spare duplicated code will not change the kmem_cache
object size and I really doubt that anyone will notice.

Thanks,

	tglx



More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list