[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 00/11] XDP unaligned chunk placement support
Jakub Kicinski
jakub.kicinski at netronome.com
Thu Jun 27 21:25:34 UTC 2019
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:14:50 +0100, Laatz, Kevin wrote:
> On the application side (xdpsock), we don't have to worry about the user
> defined headroom, since it is 0, so we only need to account for the
> XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM when computing the original address (in the default
> scenario).
That assumes specific layout for the data inside the buffer. Some NICs
will prepend information like timestamp to the packet, meaning the
packet would start at offset XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM + metadata len..
I think that's very limiting. What is the challenge in providing
aligned addresses, exactly?
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list