[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ethernet: Delete unnecessary checks before the macro call “dev_kfree_skb”

[Scott Branden]

On 2019-08-23 7:08 a.m., Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in this patch, there is one piece that looked better before. (see below)
>
> Removing the 'if (skb)' is fine, but concatening everything in one 
> statement just to save 2 variables and a few LOC is of no use, IMHO, 
> and the code is less readable.
Agreed.
>
> just my 2c.
>
>
> CJ
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> index d3a0b614dbfa..8b19ddcdafaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> @@ -2515,19 +2515,14 @@ static int bcmgenet_dma_teardown(struct 
> bcmgenet_priv *priv)
>  static void bcmgenet_fini_dma(struct bcmgenet_priv *priv)
>  {
>      struct netdev_queue *txq;
> -    struct sk_buff *skb;
> -    struct enet_cb *cb;
>      int i;
>
>      bcmgenet_fini_rx_napi(priv);
>      bcmgenet_fini_tx_napi(priv);
>
> -    for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_bds; i++) {
> -        cb = priv->tx_cbs + i;
> -        skb = bcmgenet_free_tx_cb(&priv->pdev->dev, cb);
> -        if (skb)
> -            dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> -    }
> +    for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_bds; i++)
> + dev_kfree_skb(bcmgenet_free_tx_cb(&priv->pdev->dev,
> +                          priv->tx_cbs + i));
>
>      for (i = 0; i < priv->hw_params->tx_queues; i++) {
>          txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->dev, priv->tx_rings[i].queue);