[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/2] e1000e: Do not wake up the system via WOL if device wakeup is disabled
Chen Yu
yu.c.chen at intel.com
Tue May 26 03:34:48 UTC 2020
Hi Sasha,
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:23:55AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
> fixing commit: bc7f75fa9788 ("[E1000E]: New pci-express e1000 driver (currently for ICH9 devices only)").
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.6.14, v5.4.42, v4.19.124, v4.14.181, v4.9.224, v4.4.224.
>
> v5.6.14: Build OK!
> v5.4.42: Build OK!
> v4.19.124: Build OK!
> v4.14.181: Build OK!
> v4.9.224: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> c8744f44aeae ("e1000e: Add Support for CannonLake")
>
> v4.4.224: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 16ecba59bc33 ("e1000e: Do not read ICR in Other interrupt")
> 18dd23920703 ("e1000e: use BIT() macro for bit defines")
> 74f31299a41e ("e1000e: Increase PHY PLL clock gate timing")
> c8744f44aeae ("e1000e: Add Support for CannonLake")
> f3ed935de059 ("e1000e: initial support for i219-LM (3)")
>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
>
We could discard the change for v4.9 and v4.4 IMO, as their impact should be
minor.
Thanks,
Chenyu
> --
> Thanks
> Sasha
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list