[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/2] igc: Fix wrong timestamp latency numbers

[Vinicius Costa Gomes]

The previous timestamping latency numbers were obtained by
interpolating the i210 numbers with the i225 crystal clock value. That
calculation was wrong.

Use the correct values from real measurements.

Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes at intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h | 20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
index 19f88f705ec3..522699b870c9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
@@ -303,18 +303,14 @@ extern char igc_driver_name[];
 #define IGC_RX_HDR_LEN			IGC_RXBUFFER_256
 
 /* Transmit and receive latency (for PTP timestamps) */
-/* FIXME: These values were estimated using the ones that i225 has as
- * basis, they seem to provide good numbers with ptp4l/phc2sys, but we
- * need to confirm them.
- */
-#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_10		9542
-#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_100		1024
-#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_1000	178
-#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_2500	64
-#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_10		20662
-#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_100		2213
-#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_1000	448
-#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_2500	160
+#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_10		240
+#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_100		58
+#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_1000	80
+#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_2500	1325
+#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_10		6450
+#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_100		185
+#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_1000	300
+#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_2500	1485
 
 /* RX and TX descriptor control thresholds.
  * PTHRESH - MAC will consider prefetch if it has fewer than this number of
-- 
2.28.0