[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/2] igc: Fix wrong timestamp latency numbers

[Vinicius Costa Gomes]

Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg at intel.com> writes:

> Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
>
>> The previous timestamping latency numbers were obtained by
>> interpolating the i210 numbers with the i225 crystal clock value. That
>> calculation was wrong.
>> 
>> Use the correct values from real measurements.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes at intel.com>
>
> Is this targeted at net or net-next, and because it is a fix I
> recommend you have subject
> [PATCH net 1/2]

Oh, sorry about that. I used the wrong 'git format-patch' line.

>
> and you should include a "Fixes:" tag since this driver has been
> released in previous kernels.

Yes. This should have been directed to 'net-queue', thanks for noticing.

Will send a v2.


Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius