[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH next-queue v2 3/3] igc: Add support for PTP getcrosststamp()

Jakub Kicinski kuba at kernel.org
Wed Nov 18 15:55:34 UTC 2020


On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:21:48 -0800 Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> > Also, what is the point of providing time measurements every 1
> > millisecond?  
> 
> I sincerely have no idea. I had no power on how the hardware was
> designed, and how PTM was implemented in HW.

Is the PTMed latency not dependent on how busy the bus is?
That'd make 1ms more reasonable.


More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list