[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: Add a delay to let ME unconfigure s0ix when DPG_EXIT_DONE is already flagged
Paul Menzel
pmenzel at molgen.mpg.de
Tue Oct 26 07:27:04 UTC 2021
Dear Kai-Heng,
On 26.10.21 08:51, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
In the commit message summary, maybe write:
> e1000e: Add 1 s delay …
> On some ADL platforms, DPG_EXIT_DONE is always flagged so e1000e resume
> polling logic doesn't wait until ME really unconfigures s0ix.
Please list one broken system. The log message says, it’s a firmware
bug. Please elaborate.
> So check DPG_EXIT_DONE before issuing EXIT_DPG, and if it's already
> flagged, wait for 1 second to let ME unconfigure s0ix.
Where did you get the one second from?
> Fixes: 3e55d231716e ("e1000e: Add handshake with the CSME to support S0ix")
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214821
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng at canonical.com>
> ---
> v2:
> Add missing "Fixes:" tag
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 44e2dc8328a22..cd81ba00a6bc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -6493,14 +6493,21 @@ static void e1000e_s0ix_exit_flow(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> u32 mac_data;
> u16 phy_data;
> u32 i = 0;
> + bool dpg_exit_done;
>
> if (er32(FWSM) & E1000_ICH_FWSM_FW_VALID) {
> + dpg_exit_done = er32(EXFWSM) & E1000_EXFWSM_DPG_EXIT_DONE;
> /* Request ME unconfigure the device from S0ix */
> mac_data = er32(H2ME);
> mac_data &= ~E1000_H2ME_START_DPG;
> mac_data |= E1000_H2ME_EXIT_DPG;
> ew32(H2ME, mac_data);
>
> + if (dpg_exit_done) {
> + e_warn("DPG_EXIT_DONE is already flagged. This is a firmware bug\n");
What firmware exactly? Management Engine?
> + msleep(1000);
One second is quite long. Can some bit be polled instead?
> + }
> +
> /* Poll up to 2.5 seconds for ME to unconfigure DPG.
> * If this takes more than 1 second, show a warning indicating a
> * firmware bug
>
Kind regards,
Paul
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list