[Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 2/5] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status

[Ido Schimmel]

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 01:16:22PM +0000, Machnikowski, Maciej wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ido Schimmel <idosch at idosch.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 9:10 AM
> > To: Machnikowski, Maciej <maciej.machnikowski at intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RFC v5 net-next 2/5] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE
> > message to get SyncE status
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Maciej Machnikowski wrote:
> > > +/* SyncE section */
> > > +
> > > +enum if_eec_state {
> > > +	IF_EEC_STATE_INVALID = 0,
> > > +	IF_EEC_STATE_FREERUN,
> > > +	IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED,
> > > +	IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED_HO_ACQ,
> > 
> > Is this referring to "Locked mode, acquiring holdover: This is a
> > temporary mode, when coming from free-run, to acquire holdover
> > memory."
> > ?
> 
> Locked HO ACQ means locked and holdover acquired. It's the state that
> allows transferring to the holdover state. Locked means that we locked
> our frequency and started acquiring the holdover memory.

So that's a transient state, right? FWIW, I find it weird to call such a
state "LOCKED".

>  
> > It seems ice isn't using it, so maybe drop it? Can be added later in
> > case we have a driver that can report it
> 
> I'll update the driver in the next revision

You mean update it to use "IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED_HO_ACQ" instead of
"IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED"?

Regardless, would be good to document these values.

>  
> > There is also "Locked mode, holdover acquired: This is a steady state
> > mode, entered when holdover memory is acquired." But I assume that's
> > "IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED"
> > 
> > > +	IF_EEC_STATE_HOLDOVER,
> > > +};