[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-net 3/5] ice: xsk: do not clear status_error0 for ntu + nb_buffs descriptor
Alexander Lobakin
alexandr.lobakin at intel.com
Fri Dec 10 22:37:46 UTC 2021
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski at intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:59:39 +0100
> The descriptor that ntu is pointing at when we exit
> ice_alloc_rx_bufs_zc() should not have its corresponding DD bit cleared
> as descriptor is not allocated in there and it is not valid for HW
> usage.
>
> The allocation routine at the entry will fill the descriptor that ntu
> points to after it was set to ntu + nb_buffs on previous call.
>
> Even the spec says:
> "The tail pointer should be set to one descriptor beyond the last empty
> descriptor in host descriptor ring."
>
> Therefore, step away from clearing the status_error0 on ntu + nb_buffs
> descriptor.
>
> Fixes: db804cfc21e9 ("ice: Use the xsk batched rx allocation interface")
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> index 5cb61955c1f3..874fce9fa1c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> @@ -394,14 +394,9 @@ bool ice_alloc_rx_bufs_zc(struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring, u16 count)
> }
>
> ntu += nb_buffs;
> - if (ntu == rx_ring->count) {
> - rx_desc = ICE_RX_DESC(rx_ring, 0);
> - xdp = rx_ring->xdp_buf;
> + if (ntu == rx_ring->count)
Maybe use unlikely() here while at it? 1/512 (depending on ring
size) chance is low enough.
> ntu = 0;
> - }
>
> - /* clear the status bits for the next_to_use descriptor */
> - rx_desc->wb.status_error0 = 0;
> ice_release_rx_desc(rx_ring, ntu);
This interferes with my patch in next-queue ([0]) (well, supersedes
it to be precise).
Tony, what would be better to do with it, just drop mine or correct
this one (it would become an oneliner removing status_error0
assignment then)?
>
> return count == nb_buffs;
> --
> 2.33.1
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211130183649.1166842-2-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com
Al
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list