[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del handlers

[Alaa Mohamed]

On ٢٤‏/٤‏/٢٠٢٢ ٢٣:٥٢, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 4/25/22 00:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>
>> On ٢٤‏/٤‏/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٥٥, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 24/04/2022 22:49, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>> On ٢٤‏/٤‏/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٠٢, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>>>> On 24/04/2022 15:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>>>> Add extack support to .ndo_fdb_del in netdevice.h and
>>>>>> all related methods.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am at gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> changes in V3:
>>>>>>           fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c        | 4 ++--
>>>>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c           | 4 ++--
>>>>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>    drivers/net/macvlan.c                            | 2 +-
>>>>>>    drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c                   | 2 +-
>>>>>>    include/linux/netdevice.h                        | 2 +-
>>>>>>    net/bridge/br_fdb.c                              | 2 +-
>>>>>>    net/bridge/br_private.h                          | 2 +-
>>>>>>    net/core/rtnetlink.c                             | 4 ++--
>>>>>>    9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c 
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> index d768925785ca..7b55d8d94803 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -5678,10 +5678,10 @@ ice_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct 
>>>>>> nlattr __always_unused *tb[],
>>>>>>    static int
>>>>>>    ice_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, __always_unused struct nlattr 
>>>>>> *tb[],
>>>>>>            struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>>> -        __always_unused u16 vid)
>>>>>> +        __always_unused u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>>    {
>>>>>>        int err;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> +
>>>>> What's changed here?
>>>> In the previous version, I removed the blank line after "int err;" 
>>>> and you said I shouldn't so I added blank line.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, my question is are you fixing a dos ending or something else?
>>> The blank line is already there, what's wrong with it?
>> No, I didn't.
>>>
>>> The point is it's not nice to mix style fixes and other changes, 
>>> more so
>>> if nothing is mentioned in the commit message.
>> Got it, So, what should I do to fix it?
>
> Don't change that line? I mean I'm even surprised this made it in the 
> patch. As I mentioned above, there is already a new line there so I'm 
> not sure how you're removing it and adding it again. :)
>
> Cheers,
>  Nik


Thanks Nik, I will fix this.