[Intel-wired-lan] [net v2 1/1] ice: Fix crash by keep old cfg when update TCs more than queues

Anatolii Gerasymenko anatolii.gerasymenko at intel.com
Tue Aug 16 09:13:50 UTC 2022


On 15.08.2022 03:18, Ding Hui wrote:
> There are problems if allocated queues less than Traffic Classes.
> 
> Commit a632b2a4c920 ("ice: ethtool: Prohibit improper channel config
> for DCB") already disallow setting less queues than TCs.
> 
> Another case is if we first set less queues, and later update more TCs
> config due to LLDP, ice_vsi_cfg_tc() will failed but left dirty
> num_txq/rxq and tc_cfg in vsi, that will cause invalid porinter access.

Nice catch. Looks good to me.
 
> [   95.968089] ice 0000:3b:00.1: More TCs defined than queues/rings allocated.
> [   95.968092] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Trying to use more Rx queues (8), than were allocated (1)!
> [   95.968093] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Failed to config TC for VSI index: 0
> [   95.969621] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [   95.969705] CPU: 1 PID: 58405 Comm: lldpad Kdump: loaded Tainted: G     U  W  O     --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1
> [   95.969867] Hardware name: O.E.M/BC11SPSCB10, BIOS 8.23 12/30/2021
> [   95.969992] RIP: 0010:devm_kmalloc+0xa/0x60
> [   95.970052] Code: 5c ff ff ff 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 b8 f4 ff ff ff eb f4 0f 1f 40 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 89 d1 <8b> 97 60 02 00 00 48 8d 7e 18 48 39 f7 72 3f 55 89 ce 53 48 8b 4c
> [   95.970344] RSP: 0018:ffffc9003f553888 EFLAGS: 00010206
> [   95.970425] RAX: dead000000000200 RBX: ffffea003c425b00 RCX: 00000000006080c0
> [   95.970536] RDX: 00000000006080c0 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: dead000000000200
> [   95.970648] RBP: dead000000000200 R08: 00000000000463c0 R09: ffff888ffa900000
> [   95.970760] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888ff6b40100
> [   95.970870] R13: ffff888ff6a55018 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888ff6a55460
> [   95.970981] FS:  00007f51b7d24700(0000) GS:ffff88903ee80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [   95.971108] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [   95.971197] CR2: 00007fac5410d710 CR3: 0000000f2c1de002 CR4: 00000000007606e0
> [   95.971309] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [   95.971419] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [   95.971530] PKRU: 55555554
> [   95.971573] Call Trace:
> [   95.971622]  ice_setup_rx_ring+0x39/0x110 [ice]
> [   95.971695]  ice_vsi_setup_rx_rings+0x54/0x90 [ice]
> [   95.971774]  ice_vsi_open+0x25/0x120 [ice]
> [   95.971843]  ice_open_internal+0xb8/0x1f0 [ice]
> [   95.971919]  ice_ena_vsi+0x4f/0xd0 [ice]
> [   95.971987]  ice_dcb_ena_dis_vsi.constprop.5+0x29/0x90 [ice]
> [   95.972082]  ice_pf_dcb_cfg+0x29a/0x380 [ice]
> [   95.972154]  ice_dcbnl_setets+0x174/0x1b0 [ice]
> [   95.972220]  dcbnl_ieee_set+0x89/0x230
> [   95.972279]  ? dcbnl_ieee_del+0x150/0x150
> [   95.972341]  dcb_doit+0x124/0x1b0
> [   95.972392]  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x243/0x2f0
> [   95.972457]  ? dcb_doit+0x14d/0x1b0
> [   95.972510]  ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1d3/0x280
> [   95.972591]  ? rtnl_calcit.isra.31+0x100/0x100
> [   95.972661]  netlink_rcv_skb+0xcf/0xf0
> [   95.972720]  netlink_unicast+0x16d/0x220
> [   95.972781]  netlink_sendmsg+0x2ba/0x3a0
> [   95.975891]  sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x50
> [   95.979032]  ___sys_sendmsg+0x2e4/0x300
> [   95.982147]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x13e/0x190
> [   95.985242]  ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x79/0x90
> [   95.988338]  ? __check_object_size+0xac/0x1b0
> [   95.991440]  ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30
> [   95.994539]  ? move_addr_to_user+0xbb/0xd0
> [   95.997619]  ? __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80
> [   96.000664]  __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80
> [   96.003747]  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1d0
> [   96.006862]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
> 
> Only update num_txq/rxq when passed check, and restore tc_cfg if setup
> queue map failed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <dinghui at sangfor.com.cn>

Please, also add Fixes tag.

> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 42 +++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> ---
> v1:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220812123933.5481-1-dinghui@sangfor.com.cn/
> 
> v2:
>   rewrite subject
>   rebase to net
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> index a830f7f9aed0..6e64cca30351 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void ice_set_dflt_vsi_ctx(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
>   */
>  static int ice_vsi_setup_q_map(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
>  {
> -	u16 offset = 0, qmap = 0, tx_count = 0, pow = 0;
> +	u16 offset = 0, qmap = 0, tx_count = 0, rx_count = 0, pow = 0;
>  	u16 num_txq_per_tc, num_rxq_per_tc;
>  	u16 qcount_tx = vsi->alloc_txq;
>  	u16 qcount_rx = vsi->alloc_rxq;
> @@ -981,23 +981,25 @@ static int ice_vsi_setup_q_map(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
>  	 * at least 1)
>  	 */
>  	if (offset)
> -		vsi->num_rxq = offset;
> +		rx_count = offset;
>  	else
> -		vsi->num_rxq = num_rxq_per_tc;
> +		rx_count = num_rxq_per_tc;
>  
> -	if (vsi->num_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
> +	if (rx_count > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
>  		dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Rx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
> -			vsi->num_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
> +			rx_count, vsi->alloc_rxq);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	vsi->num_txq = tx_count;
> -	if (vsi->num_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
> +	if (tx_count > vsi->alloc_txq) {
>  		dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Tx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
> -			vsi->num_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
> +			tx_count, vsi->alloc_txq);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	vsi->num_txq = tx_count;
> +	vsi->num_rxq = rx_count;
> +
>  	if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_VF && vsi->num_txq != vsi->num_rxq) {
>  		dev_dbg(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "VF VSI should have same number of Tx and Rx queues. Hence making them equal\n");
>  		/* since there is a chance that num_rxq could have been changed
> @@ -3492,6 +3494,7 @@ ice_vsi_setup_q_map_mqprio(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt,
>  	int tc0_qcount = vsi->mqprio_qopt.qopt.count[0];
>  	u8 netdev_tc = 0;
>  	int i;
> +	u16 new_txq, new_rxq;

Please follow the Reverse Christmas Tree (RCT) convention.

>  	vsi->tc_cfg.ena_tc = ena_tc ? ena_tc : 1;
>  
> @@ -3530,21 +3533,24 @@ ice_vsi_setup_q_map_mqprio(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Set actual Tx/Rx queue pairs */
> -	vsi->num_txq = offset + qcount_tx;
> -	if (vsi->num_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
> +	new_txq = offset + qcount_tx;
> +	if (new_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
>  		dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Tx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
> -			vsi->num_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
> +			new_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	vsi->num_rxq = offset + qcount_rx;
> -	if (vsi->num_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
> +	new_rxq = offset + qcount_rx;
> +	if (new_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
>  		dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Rx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
> -			vsi->num_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
> +			new_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Set actual Tx/Rx queue pairs */
> +	vsi->num_txq = new_txq;
> +	vsi->num_rxq = new_rxq;
> +
>  	/* Setup queue TC[0].qmap for given VSI context */
>  	ctxt->info.tc_mapping[0] = cpu_to_le16(qmap);
>  	ctxt->info.q_mapping[0] = cpu_to_le16(vsi->rxq_map[0]);
> @@ -3580,6 +3586,7 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	int i, ret = 0;
>  	u8 num_tc = 0;
> +	struct ice_tc_cfg old_tc_cfg;

RCT here also.
  
>  	dev = ice_pf_to_dev(pf);
>  	if (vsi->tc_cfg.ena_tc == ena_tc &&
> @@ -3600,6 +3607,7 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
>  			max_txqs[i] = vsi->num_txq;
>  	}
>  
> +	memcpy(&old_tc_cfg, &vsi->tc_cfg, sizeof(old_tc_cfg));
>  	vsi->tc_cfg.ena_tc = ena_tc;
>  	vsi->tc_cfg.numtc = num_tc;
>  
> @@ -3616,8 +3624,10 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
>  	else
>  		ret = ice_vsi_setup_q_map(vsi, ctx);
>  
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
> +		memcpy(&vsi->tc_cfg, &old_tc_cfg, sizeof(vsi->tc_cfg));
>  		goto out;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* must to indicate which section of VSI context are being modified */
>  	ctx->info.valid_sections = cpu_to_le16(ICE_AQ_VSI_PROP_RXQ_MAP_VALID);


More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list