[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] ice: copy last block omitted in ice_get_module_eeprom()
Jesse Brandeburg
jesse.brandeburg at intel.com
Wed Mar 1 19:26:55 UTC 2023
On 3/1/2023 9:14 AM, Petr Oros wrote:
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> index b360bd8f15998b..1dc3f9fc74bdfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> @@ -4293,6 +4293,7 @@ ice_get_module_eeprom(struct net_device *netdev,
> bool is_sfp = false;
> unsigned int i, j;
> u16 offset = 0;
> + u32 copy_len;
copy_len should only be declared in the "if" below so that it's only
declared in the context it is used.
> u8 page = 0;
> int status;
>
> @@ -4354,8 +4355,9 @@ ice_get_module_eeprom(struct net_device *netdev,
> }
>
> /* Make sure we have enough room for the new block */
> - if ((i + SFF_READ_BLOCK_SIZE) < ee->len)
> - memcpy(data + i, value, SFF_READ_BLOCK_SIZE);
> + copy_len = min_t(u32, SFF_READ_BLOCK_SIZE,
> + ee->len - i);
also this line can be unwrapped now.
> + memcpy(data + i, value, copy_len);
> }
> }
> return 0;
I've tested this and it fixes the problem. Interestingly, the ethtool
application when compiled without netlink support parsed the output
correctly so caused a bit of confusion around this issue.
Thank you Petr!
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list