[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V6 5/5] selftests/bpf: Adjust bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash for new arg

Alexei Starovoitov alexei.starovoitov at gmail.com
Mon Apr 3 23:02:21 UTC 2023


On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jesper Brouer <jbrouer at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> søn. 2. apr. 2023 17.50 skrev Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov at gmail.com>:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:30 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Update BPF selftests to use the new RSS type argument for kfunc
>> > bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com>
>> > Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at redhat.com>
>> > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
>> > ---
>> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c        |    2 ++
>> >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c  |   14 +++++++++-----
>> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_metadata.c   |    6 +++---
>> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_metadata2.c  |    7 ++++---
>> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c      |    2 +-
>> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h         |    1 +
>> >  6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c
>> > index aa4beae99f4f..8c5e98da9ae9 100644
>> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c
>> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c
>> > @@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ static int verify_xsk_metadata(struct xsk *xsk)
>> >         if (!ASSERT_NEQ(meta->rx_hash, 0, "rx_hash"))
>> >                 return -1;
>> >
>> > +       ASSERT_EQ(meta->rx_hash_type, 0, "rx_hash_type");
>> > +
>> >         xsk_ring_cons__release(&xsk->rx, 1);
>> >         refill_rx(xsk, comp_addr);
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> > index 4c55b4d79d3d..7b3fc12e96d6 100644
>> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> > @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ struct {
>> >
>> >  extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
>> >                                          __u64 *timestamp) __ksym;
>> > -extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
>> > -                                   __u32 *hash) __ksym;
>> > +extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, __u32 *hash,
>> > +                                   enum xdp_rss_hash_type *rss_type) __ksym;
>> >
>> >  SEC("xdp")
>> >  int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>> > @@ -74,10 +74,14 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>> >         else
>> >                 meta->rx_timestamp = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
>> >
>> > -       if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash))
>> > -               bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with %u", meta->rx_hash);
>> > -       else
>> > +       if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash, &meta->rx_hash_type)) {
>> > +               bpf_printk("populated rx_hash:0x%X type:0x%X",
>> > +                          meta->rx_hash, meta->rx_hash_type);
>> > +               if (!(meta->rx_hash_type & XDP_RSS_L4))
>> > +                       bpf_printk("rx_hash low quality L3 hash type");
>> > +       } else {
>> >                 meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
>> > +       }
>>
>> Didn't we agree in the previous thread to remove these printks and
>> replace them with actual stats that user space can see?
>
>
> This patchset is for bpf-tree RC version of kernel.
> Thus, we keep changes to a minimum.
>
> I/we will do printk work on bpf-next.
> (Once I get home from vacation next week)

Sorry, but I insist on making them in this set.
We did bigger changes in bpf tree, so size is not an issue.
I don't want to remember to ping you every week or so to
remind you to fix this later after bpf gets merged into bpf-next.
Less work for me and less work for you to do it now.


More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list