[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] ice: add individual interrupt allocation
Piotr Raczynski
piotr.raczynski at intel.com
Fri May 12 15:55:38 UTC 2023
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:51:28PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:43:19PM +0200, Piotr Raczynski wrote:
> > Currently interrupt allocations, depending on a feature are distributed
> > in batches. Also, after allocation there is a series of operations that
> > distributes per irq settings through that batch of interrupts.
> >
> > Although driver does not yet support dynamic interrupt allocation, keep
> > allocated interrupts in a pool and add allocation abstraction logic to
> > make code more flexible. Keep per interrupt information in the
> > ice_q_vector structure, which yields ice_vsi::base_vector redundant.
> > Also, as a result there are a few functions that can be removed.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski at linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman at corigine.com>
> > Tested-by: Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha at intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski at intel.com>
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c
> > index 1911d644dfa8..7dd7a0f32471 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c
> > @@ -105,8 +105,7 @@ static int ice_vsi_alloc_q_vector(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u16 v_idx)
> > struct ice_q_vector *q_vector;
> >
> > /* allocate q_vector */
> > - q_vector = devm_kzalloc(ice_pf_to_dev(pf), sizeof(*q_vector),
> > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > + q_vector = kzalloc(sizeof(*q_vector), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!q_vector)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > @@ -118,9 +117,31 @@ static int ice_vsi_alloc_q_vector(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u16 v_idx)
> > q_vector->rx.itr_mode = ITR_DYNAMIC;
> > q_vector->tx.type = ICE_TX_CONTAINER;
> > q_vector->rx.type = ICE_RX_CONTAINER;
> > + q_vector->irq.index = -ENOENT;
> >
> > - if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_VF)
> > + if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_VF) {
> > + q_vector->reg_idx = ice_calc_vf_reg_idx(vsi->vf, q_vector);
> > goto out;
> > + } else if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_CTRL && vsi->vf) {
> > + struct ice_vsi *ctrl_vsi = ice_get_vf_ctrl_vsi(pf, vsi);
> > +
> > + if (ctrl_vsi) {
> > + if (unlikely(!ctrl_vsi->q_vectors))
> > + return -ENOENT;
>
> Hi Piotr,
>
> Smatch tells me that q_vector i leaked here.
>
Nice catch! Thanks. Will respin with some other fix from my side as
well.
Piotr
> > + q_vector->irq = ctrl_vsi->q_vectors[0]->irq;
> > + goto skip_alloc;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + q_vector->irq = ice_alloc_irq(pf);
> > + if (q_vector->irq.index < 0) {
> > + kfree(q_vector);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > +skip_alloc:
> > + q_vector->reg_idx = q_vector->irq.index;
> > +
> > /* only set affinity_mask if the CPU is online */
> > if (cpu_online(v_idx))
> > cpumask_set_cpu(v_idx, &q_vector->affinity_mask);
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list