[Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net v1 2/2] ice: tc: allow zero flags in parsing tc flower
Michal Swiatkowski
michal.swiatkowski at linux.intel.com
Fri Mar 15 11:08:21 UTC 2024
The check for flags is done to not pass empty lookups to adding switch
rule functions. Since metadata is always added to lookups there is no
need to check against the flag.
It is also fixing the problem with such rule:
$ tc filter add dev gtp_dev ingress protocol ip prio 0 flower \
enc_dst_port 2123 action drop
Switch block in case of GTP can't parse the destination port, because it
should always be set to GTP specific value. The same with ethertype. The
result is that there is no other matching criteria than GTP tunnel. In
this case flags is 0, rule can't be added only because of defensive
check against flags.
Fixes: 9a225f81f540 ("ice: Support GTP-U and GTP-C offload in switchdev")
Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c
index a8c686ecd1a0..f8df93e1a9de 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ ice_eswitch_add_tc_fltr(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_tc_flower_fltr *fltr)
int ret;
int i;
- if (!flags || (flags & ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_ENC_SRC_L4_PORT)) {
+ if (flags & ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_ENC_SRC_L4_PORT) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(fltr->extack, "Unsupported encap field(s)");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
2.42.0
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list