[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: flower: validate control flags
Buvaneswaran, Sujai
sujai.buvaneswaran at intel.com
Fri May 3 05:57:33 UTC 2024
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces at osuosl.org> On Behalf Of
> Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8:14 PM
> To: intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet at google.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen at intel.com>; Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast at fiberby.net>;
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni at redhat.com>;
> David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: flower: validate control flags
>
> This driver currently doesn't support any control flags.
>
> Use flow_rule_has_control_flags() to check for control flags, such as can be
> set through `tc flower ... ip_flags frag`.
>
> In case any control flags are masked, flow_rule_has_control_flags() sets a NL
> extended error message, and we return -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Only compile-tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast at fiberby.net>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
Hi,
I have tested this patch in upstream kernel - 6.9.0-rc5+ and observing no effect while adding tc flow rule with control flags.
'Not supported' error is not shown while adding the below tc rule.
[root at cbl-mariner ~]# tc qdisc add dev ens5f0np0 ingress
[root at cbl-mariner ~]#
[root at cbl-mariner ~]# tc filter add dev ens5f0np0 ingress protocol ip flower ip_flags frag/firstfrag action drop
[root at cbl-mariner ~]#
[root at cbl-mariner ~]# ethtool -i ens5f0np0
driver: ice
version: 6.9.0-rc5+
firmware-version: 4.40 0x8001c967 1.3534.0
expansion-rom-version:
bus-info: 0000:b1:00.0
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom-access: yes
supports-register-dump: yes
supports-priv-flags: yes
Same behavior is observed with iavf driver on VF as well.
Regards,
Sujai B
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list