[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] ice: implement AQ download pkg retry
Naveen Mamindlapalli
naveenm at marvell.com
Fri May 17 07:26:08 UTC 2024
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 7:34 PM
> To: netdev at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> Subject: [PATCH iwl-net] ice: implement AQ download pkg retry
>
> ice_aqc_opc_download_pkg (0x0C40) AQ sporadically returns error due to FW
> issue. Fix this by retrying five times before moving to Safe Mode.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.c
> index ce5034ed2b24..19e2111fcf08 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.c
> @@ -1339,6 +1339,7 @@ ice_dwnld_cfg_bufs_no_lock(struct ice_hw *hw, struct
> ice_buf *bufs, u32 start,
>
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> bool last = false;
> + int try_cnt = 0;
> int status;
>
> bh = (struct ice_buf_hdr *)(bufs + start + i); @@ -1346,8
> +1347,22 @@ ice_dwnld_cfg_bufs_no_lock(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_buf
> *bufs, u32 start,
> if (indicate_last)
> last = ice_is_last_download_buffer(bh, i, count);
>
> - status = ice_aq_download_pkg(hw, bh, ICE_PKG_BUF_SIZE,
> last,
> - &offset, &info, NULL);
> + while (try_cnt < 5) {
> + status = ice_aq_download_pkg(hw, bh,
> ICE_PKG_BUF_SIZE,
> + last, &offset, &info,
> + NULL);
> + if (hw->adminq.sq_last_status != ICE_AQ_RC_ENOSEC
> &&
> + hw->adminq.sq_last_status != ICE_AQ_RC_EBADSIG)
> + break;
> +
> + try_cnt++;
> + msleep(20);
> + }
> +
> + if (try_cnt)
> + dev_dbg(ice_hw_to_dev(hw),
> + "ice_aq_download_pkg failed, number of retries:
> %d\n",
> + try_cnt);
Do you really need this dbg statement when try_cnt < 5? Is it not misleading in success case (with retries)?
Thanks,
Naveen
>
> /* Save AQ status from download package */
> if (status) {
> --
> 2.40.1
>
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list