[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 1/2] ice: Fix entering Safe Mode

Marcin Szycik marcin.szycik at linux.intel.com
Mon Sep 23 10:13:57 UTC 2024



On 20.09.2024 19:14, Brett Creeley wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/20/2024 9:59 AM, Marcin Szycik wrote:
>> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>>
>>
>> If DDP package is missing or corrupted, the driver should enter Safe Mode.
>> Instead, an error is returned and probe fails.
>>
>> Don't check return value of ice_init_ddp_config() to fix this.
>>
>> Change ice_init_ddp_config() type to void, as now its return is never
>> checked.
>>
>> Repro:
>> * Remove or rename DDP package (/lib/firmware/intel/ice/ddp/ice.pkg)
>> * Load ice
>>
>> Fixes: cc5776fe1832 ("ice: Enable switching default Tx scheduler topology")
>> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Change ice_init_ddp_config() type to void
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 15 +++------------
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> index 0f5c9d347806..aeebf4ae25ae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> @@ -4548,34 +4548,27 @@ ice_init_tx_topology(struct ice_hw *hw, const struct firmware *firmware)
>>    *
>>    * This function loads DDP file from the disk, then initializes Tx
>>    * topology. At the end DDP package is loaded on the card.
>> - *
>> - * Return: zero when init was successful, negative values otherwise.
>>    */
>> -static int ice_init_ddp_config(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_pf *pf)
>> +static void ice_init_ddp_config(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_pf *pf)
>>   {
>>          struct device *dev = ice_pf_to_dev(pf);
>>          const struct firmware *firmware = NULL;
>>          int err;
>>
>>          err = ice_request_fw(pf, &firmware);
>> -       if (err) {
>> +       if (err)
>>                  dev_err(dev, "Fail during requesting FW: %d\n", err);
>> -               return err;
>> -       }
>>
>>          err = ice_init_tx_topology(hw, firmware);
>>          if (err) {
>>                  dev_err(dev, "Fail during initialization of Tx topology: %d\n",
>>                          err);
>>                  release_firmware(firmware);
>> -               return err;
>>          }
>>
>>          /* Download firmware to device */
>>          ice_load_pkg(firmware, pf);
>>          release_firmware(firmware);
>> -
>> -       return 0;
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -4748,9 +4741,7 @@ int ice_init_dev(struct ice_pf *pf)
>>
>>          ice_init_feature_support(pf);
>>
>> -       err = ice_init_ddp_config(hw, pf);
>> -       if (err)
>> -               return err;
>> +       ice_init_ddp_config(hw, pf);
> 
> I just commented this on v1 as I didn't expect it to be resent. I'm also okay with Maciej's suggestion, but I wanted to offer an alternative option.
> 
> As an alternative solution you could potentially do the following, which
> would make the flow more readable:
> 
> err = ice_init_ddp_config(hw, pf);
> if (err || ice_is_safe_mode(pf))
>        ice_set_safe_mode_caps(hw);

This sounds reasonable, I'll change it if there will be no more comments.

> Also, should there be some sort of messaging if the device goes into
> safe mode? I wonder if a dev_dbg() would be better than nothing. If ice_init_ddp_config() fails, then it will print an error message, so maybe a dev_warn/info() is warranted if (err)? Of course this would depend on ice_init_ddp_config() to return a non-void value.

ice_request_fw() already prints a dev_err() message when entering safe mode, so I don't think it's necessary here.

Thanks,
Marcin
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brett
> 
>>
>>          /* if ice_init_ddp_config fails, ICE_FLAG_ADV_FEATURES bit won't be
>>           * set in pf->state, which will cause ice_is_safe_mode to return
>> -- 
>> 2.45.0
>>
>>



More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list