[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: fix VF dynamic interrupt ctl register initialization

Singh, Krishneil K krishneil.k.singh at intel.com
Wed Sep 25 20:22:53 UTC 2024


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <horms at kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 1:49 AM
> To: Zaki, Ahmed <ahmed.zaki at intel.com>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org; netdev at vger.kernel.org; Linga, Pavan
> Kumar <pavan.kumar.linga at intel.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <przemyslaw.kitszel at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: fix VF dynamic interrupt ctl register
> initialization
> 
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:38:25PM -0600, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> > The VF's dynamic interrupt ctl "dyn_ctl_intrvl_s" is not initialized
> > in idpf_vf_intr_reg_init(). This resulted in the following UBSAN error
> > whenever a VF is created:
> >
> > [  564.345655] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:3654:10
> > [  564.345663] shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
> > [  564.345671] CPU: 33 UID: 0 PID: 2458 Comm: NetworkManager Not tainted
> 6.11.0-rc4+ #1
> > [  564.345678] Hardware name: Intel Corporation
> M50CYP2SBSTD/M50CYP2SBSTD, BIOS SE5C6200.86B.0027.P10.2201070222
> 01/07/2022
> > [  564.345683] Call Trace:
> > [  564.345688]  <TASK>
> > [  564.345693]  dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xb0
> > [  564.345708]  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x16b/0x320
> > [  564.345730]  idpf_vport_intr_update_itr_ena_irq.cold+0x13/0x39 [idpf]
> > [  564.345755]  ? __pfx_idpf_vport_intr_update_itr_ena_irq+0x10/0x10 [idpf]
> > [  564.345771]  ? static_obj+0x95/0xd0
> > [  564.345782]  ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x1a5/0x800
> > [  564.345794]  idpf_vport_intr_ena+0x5ef/0x9f0 [idpf]
> > [  564.345814]  idpf_vport_open+0x2cc/0x1240 [idpf]
> > [  564.345837]  idpf_open+0x6d/0xc0 [idpf]
> > [  564.345850]  __dev_open+0x241/0x420
> >
> > Fixes: d4d558718266 ("idpf: initialize interrupts and enable vport")
> > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki at intel.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> I see that this now matches the implementation of idpf_intr_reg_init().
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms at kernel.org>

Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <krishneil.k.singh at intel.com>


More information about the Intel-wired-lan mailing list