[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH linux-next] ice: use string choice helpers
Przemek Kitszel
przemyslaw.kitszel at intel.com
Wed Oct 30 07:19:20 UTC 2024
On 10/29/24 17:37, R Sundar wrote:
> On 28/10/24 15:24, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
>> On 10/27/24 15:19, R Sundar wrote:
>>> Use string choice helpers for better readability.
>>> bwm_lf.plllock_true_lock_cri ? "locked" : "unlocked");
>>
>> perhaps locked/unlocked could be added into string_choices.h
>>
>
> Sure, Can I add locked/unlocked changes in linux-next repository and use
> suggested-by Tag?
sure, that's way to go
but please first check if there are any other users (despite this
driver)
>
>
>>> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int ice_cfg_cgu_pll_e82x(struct ice_hw *hw,
>>> /* Log the current clock configuration */
>>> ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_PTP, "New CGU configuration -- %s,
>>> clk_src %s, clk_freq %s, PLL %s\n",
>>> - dw24.ts_pll_enable ? "enabled" : "disabled",
>>> + str_enabled_disabled(dw24.ts_pll_enable),
>>> ice_clk_src_str(dw24.time_ref_sel),
>>> ice_clk_freq_str(dw9.time_ref_freq_sel),
>>> bwm_lf.plllock_true_lock_cri ? "locked" : "unlocked");
>>> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int ice_cfg_cgu_pll_e825c(struct ice_hw *hw,
>>> /* Log the current clock configuration */
>>> ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_PTP, "Current CGU configuration -- %s,
>>> clk_src %s, clk_freq %s, PLL %s\n",
>>> - dw24.ts_pll_enable ? "enabled" : "disabled",
>>> + str_enabled_disabled(dw24.ts_pll_enable),
>>> ice_clk_src_str(dw23.time_ref_sel),
>>> ice_clk_freq_str(dw9.time_ref_freq_sel),
>>> ro_lock.plllock_true_lock_cri ? "locked" : "unlocked");
>>> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static int ice_cfg_cgu_pll_e825c(struct ice_hw *hw,
>>> /* Log the current clock configuration */
>>> ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_PTP, "New CGU configuration -- %s,
>>> clk_src %s, clk_freq %s, PLL %s\n",
>>> - dw24.ts_pll_enable ? "enabled" : "disabled",
>>> + str_enabled_disabled(dw24.ts_pll_enable),
>>> ice_clk_src_str(dw23.time_ref_sel),
>>> ice_clk_freq_str(dw9.time_ref_freq_sel),
>>> ro_lock.plllock_true_lock_cri ? "locked" : "unlocked");
>>
>
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list