[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RFC net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-controller: Add DPLL pin properties

[Andrew Lunn]

> > I have no idea what makes sense for ACPI and little interest in
> > reviewing ACPI bindings. While I think the whole idea of shared
> > bindings is questionable, really it's a question of review bandwidth
> > and so far no one has stepped up to review ACPI bindings.
> 
> It depends... shared bindings allow drivers to read property values
> without need to have separate OF and ACPI codepaths.

Do you have real hardware in your hands using ACPI?

   Andrew