[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RFC net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-controller: Add DPLL pin properties

[Ivan Vecera]

On 1/7/26 6:31 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> I have no idea what makes sense for ACPI and little interest in
>>> reviewing ACPI bindings. While I think the whole idea of shared
>>> bindings is questionable, really it's a question of review bandwidth
>>> and so far no one has stepped up to review ACPI bindings.
>>
>> It depends... shared bindings allow drivers to read property values
>> without need to have separate OF and ACPI codepaths.
> 
> Do you have real hardware in your hands using ACPI?
> 
Yes, it is based on Intel GNR-D platform with 8 NIC ports and Microchip
DPLL chip on the board.

I.