[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 01/12] dt-bindings: dpll: add common dpll-pin-consumer schema
Ivan Vecera
ivecera at redhat.com
Fri Jan 9 10:22:03 UTC 2026
On 1/9/26 10:48 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>> Introduce a common schema for DPLL pin consumers. Devices such as Ethernet
>> controllers and PHYs may require connections to DPLL pins for Synchronous
>> Ethernet (SyncE) or other frequency synchronization tasks.
>>
>> Defining these properties in a shared schema ensures consistency across
>> different device types that consume DPLL resources.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/dpll/dpll-pin-consumer.yaml | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/dpll-pin-consumer.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/dpll-pin-consumer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/dpll-pin-consumer.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..60c184c18318a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/dpll-pin-consumer.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dpll/dpll-pin-consumer.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: DPLL Pin Consumer
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Ivan Vecera <ivecera at redhat.com>
>> +
>
> You miss select. Without it this binding is no-op.
Will fix.
>> +description: |
>
> Drop |
Will do.
>> + Common properties for devices that require connection to DPLL (Digital Phase
>> + Locked Loop) pins for frequency synchronization (e.g. SyncE).
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + dpll-pins:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>> + description:
>> + List of phandles to the DPLL pin nodes connected to this device.
>> +
>> + dpll-pin-names:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
>> + description:
>> + Names for the DPLL pins defined in 'dpll-pins', in the same order.
>> +
>> +dependencies:
>> + dpll-pin-names: [ dpll-pins ]
>
> Binding should go to dtschema. See also commit
> 3282a891060aace02e3eed4789739768060cea32 in dtschema or other examples
> how to add new provider/consumer properties.
Will do.
Thanks for advice...
Ivan
More information about the Intel-wired-lan
mailing list