[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v5 3/4] iavf: send MAC change request synchronously

[Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez]

Hello Aleksandr,

> I think continue at the end of the cycle is redundant.
That continue is intentional; without it, if timeout expires but there
are still messages in the queue, we give up without processing them. The
message we're waiting for might be in the queue and not a lot of messages
stored are expected.
That continue reduces possible false timeouts (because the expected message
could be stored in the queue) while keeping the delay minimal.
The timeout is really just an estimate, and I don't think it needs
to be very precise.

Thanks

Best regards
Jose Ignacio