[Replicant] is replicant 6 insecure? does google update android 6?

[Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli]

On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 20:04:45 +0200
a <ninhar at inbox.lv> wrote:

> People who are not may have different expectations. If replicant does
> not highlight disclaimers then people can tell each other, that on
> security replicant is frivolous. Something which can work against
> replicant later on.
We need help on that. Can you try to make some patches for the
replicant.us website and/or try to do some modifications on the wiki to
fix that?

> > Replicant very clearly shows dedication to its principles
> > over popularity.
> You likely are familiar with replicant and that is why you have this
> piece of knowledge.
Making such modifications just to not appear like Replicant is looking
for users above other considerations is not interesting at all.

What is interesting is to get the issue fixed, and it would be great if
we could get some help on that as well. Replicant is a collaborative
project which is made by everyone who participates to it. And anyone is
welcome to participate.

In fact I've spent already a lot of time to try to make it as easy as
possible to participate in various areas, especially on documentation.

And while we are not looking for users above other considerations, we
are in fact looking for people to collaborate together on Replicant,
and this is a good opportunity to do that, this way the problem would
be fixed for good, instead of having to discuss endlessly about it.

Denis.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/replicant/attachments/20200404/602cad69/attachment.asc>