lance at osuosl.org
Thu Jul 31 22:52:00 UTC 2014
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Kennric <kennric at osuosl.org> wrote:
> We need to decide on the license to apply to the open-source products of
> work. I think both back-end and mobile code should use the same license,
> but I
> don't know what that means for the Apple side of things.
> We tend to prefer Apache v2 , but other possibilities are:
> MIT  - more permissive and simpler, perhaps more ambiguous when it
> comes to
> patent issues.
> GPL 2  (or 3 )- includes clauses requiring derivative works to also
> open source.
> The OSL and OSU tend to prefer Apache for its legal simplicity and clarity.
> It is a good idea to choose and apply the license as soon as the git repo
Unless there's no objections I'd prefer we go with the Apache license. I
think for our purposes its the best choice for what we're doing.
Oregon State University | Open Source Lab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the seagrant-dev